Re: maybe we could all?

From:	Nathan Rixham	Date:	Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:04:03 +0000
Subject:	Re: maybe we could all?
References:	1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11	Groups:	php.general
Request:	Send a blank email to php-general+get-286799@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message

Eric Butera wrote:

On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrixham@gmail.com> wrote:
Kyle Terry wrote: and on the other side.. to open things up interface Object { } or abstract class Object { } or class Object { } nothing else for now: reason: to address the current and forseable lack of function(object $obj) in php; in addition to allow future scope for any common to all methods (or any implementation of this to have) i guess first is it a good idea to have any of the above and to address this, then next if so which?
That needs to be prefixed. Or maybe namespaces if you're targeting 5.3? It'd suck to have a lot of code using such a thing only to become a reserved word.

agreed, prefixed or namespaced (2 versions preference) thought now that should php introduce a superclass all others inherit, then "ours" should inherit it as well.. so non clashing name for sure. that's if we need one..? [imho +1 to one of the above]