Re: maybe we could all?
| From: | Jason Pruim | Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 17:28:42 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: maybe we could all? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-286869@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Jan 20, 2009, at 12:02 PM, Kyle Terry wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Shawn McKenzie <nospam@mckenzies.net>wrote:Would version 2 then be called CODE "Common Objects and Datatypes Enhanced"? -- Jason Pruim japruim@raoset.com 616.399.2355Kyle Terry wrote:Project COD: For the World, By the World.On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Rixham <nrixham@gmail.com>wrote:wrote:Eric Butera wrote:On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Kyle Terry <kyle@kyleterry.com>wrote:On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Brown <danbrown@php.net>SVN,On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 19:58, Edmund Hertle<edmund.hertle@student.kit.edu> wrote:Well, I think we should not go to fast... maybe we are setting up4-5webspace, domain, mailing-list and in the end this is only used byifpeople. Because than this can be discussed on this mailinglist. Buttothereare quite enough people interested, it would be indeed a good idea"regulars"startsome other kind of communication...I flat-out disagree with this, Ed. Nothing at all against you, though. This is the General list for PHP, and while this project is PHP-related (and "general" in nature), if we allow even thetoto do so here, how can we then tell others that we won't allow themthosediscuss their PHP-related projects on this list? Putting the code on a proper system to begin with means no screwing around later when the project is running at full steam. And even if there are only four or five people working on it, iffindfolks put in a good effort, they can work wonders. -- </Daniel P. Brown> daniel.brown@parasane.net || danbrown@php.net http://www.parasane.net/ || http://www.pilotpig.net/ Unadvertised dedicated server deals, too low to print - email me totoout! I work on a development team of 3; me and 2 others. 1 of which onlydevelops about a quarter of his time here. Even with my co worker sitting nextthenstill up :p dan - great offer, I'd like to take you up on it [could we install any extra needed software, such as a wiki / list or something that allows discussion and document storage made website available] svn - a must imho consideration: been thinking 2 things 1 - this could be a lot of noise on the list; perhaps an approach of rfc and publish every idea, post link to it here so anybody can contribute,me, if we weren't using a repo, we would both be at a complete loss (right word?). -- Kyle Terry | www.kyleterry.comI have been using svn for 3 years by myself. Recently I talked my other co workers to play with it and they love it. But even in an army of one it's amazing to be able to figure out what I messed up last week or why I decided to change something at 5:00. People have wrote books on it though, so I'll hush.ifgo from there. discuss [ wiki needed? ]wiki will definitely be needed.2 - actually that was both in one sentance maybe first rfc should be "super class for all xxxx (our) objects" andcan'tso what + a name, cos if we need to start prefixing.. and it can't be 4LC asGiven "Common Objects and Datatypes", has anyone proposed "COD Pieces"? -- Thanks! -Shawn http://www.spidean.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.phpstart with a number :pThe world's object?this will be massively interesting..