Re: Unique User Hashes

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:34 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote: > Chris napsal(a): > > Martin Zvarík wrote: > >> Chris napsal(a): > >>> Martin Zvarík wrote: > >>>> tedd napsal(a): > >>>>> At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote: > >>>>>> tedd napsal(a): > >>>>>>> At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote: > >>>>>>>> tedd napsal(a): > >>>>>>>>> At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input > >>>>>>>>>> your > >>>>>>>>>> email address - and if I would I would not vote - > >>>>>>>>>> because > >>>>>>>>>> it's a waste of my time... if you want me to vote > >>>>>>>>>> you do > >>>>>>>>>> everything you can to make it as pleasant as possible > >>>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>>> certainly that isn't requirement of an email > >>>>>>>>>> validation. > >>>> Btw. google "free temporary email address" to see how unique email > >>>> addresses really are - in case you meant it in reference to the > >>>> poll voting - where you care about uniqueness of votes = people. > >>> > >>> So instead of trolling, offer a better suggestion. > >> Chris, if you would read the whole thread (my first comment), I bet > >> you would consider more wisely your patronizing comment. > > > > "Use the ip" - which we've all said is useless. > > Where's the better suggestion? > Nevermind, I was wrong - thank you for making me realize I am wasting > time here. > > This useless IP solution is used by 80% of websites. I was trying to > convice you that requirement of an email validation is just, let's say, > unwise. So, don't bark if you don't agree. So you;'e saying that unless we agree with you, not to mention anything? Ash www.ashleysheridan.co.uk