Re: Unique User Hashes

Martin Zvarík wrote:

Ashley Sheridan napsal(a):

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 23:34 +0100, Martin Zvarík wrote:

Chris napsal(a):

Martin Zvarík wrote:

     
Chris napsal(a):
       
Martin Zvarík wrote:
         
tedd napsal(a):
           
At 5:28 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
             
tedd napsal(a):
               
At 5:10 PM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
                 
tedd napsal(a):
                   
At 1:49 AM +0100 2/19/09, Martin Zvarík wrote:
                     
Guys, I have not seen a poll where you need to input your email address - and if I would I would not vote - because it's a waste of my time... if you want me to vote you do everything you can to make it as pleasant as possible -- certainly that isn't requirement of an email validation.
                        
Btw. google "free temporary email address" to see how unique email addresses really are - in case you meant it in reference to the poll voting - where you care about uniqueness of votes = people.
            
So instead of trolling, offer a better suggestion.
          
Chris, if you would read the whole thread (my first comment), I bet you would consider more wisely your patronizing comment.
        
"Use the ip" - which we've all said is useless.

Where's the better suggestion?

Nevermind, I was wrong - thank you for making me realize I am wasting time here. This useless IP solution is used by 80% of websites. I was trying to convice you that requirement of an email validation is just, let's say, unwise. So, don't bark if you don't agree.

So you;'e saying that unless we agree with you, not to mention anything? Ash www.ashleysheridan.co.uk

I meant: You don't have to bark, if you don't agree. = We can discuss.

it's all a bit pointless, the only way to ensure only one vote per person is to get take and test a dns sample from each user. anything else is going to be flawed