Re: time() TIMER in seconds or just numbers
| From: | haliphax | Date: | Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:42:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: time() TIMER in seconds or just numbers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-290854@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Igor Escobar <titiolinkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> The people use that to measure performance.
>
> If you're intersted about that read
>
> http://www.igorescobar.com/blog/2009/03/05/benchmarking-de-desempenho-no-php/íÃð"
> ±çêg´Ñ9Ùf
> (in portuguese, sorry)
>
> Regards,
> Igor Escobar
>
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:05 PM, haliphax <haliphax@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Richard Heyes <richard@php.net> wrote:
>> >> When someone does that, it means the execution time between $t1 and
>> >> $t2...
>> >
>> > Is that for my benefit? Believe it or not, I do know the arcane art of
>> > subtraction...
>>
>> I would subtract more often, but sacrificial farm animals and black
>> candles are so hard to come by these days...
Oh, I'm fully aware of what it's for. FYI, microtime() is probably
more appropriate, since 1 full second in computer terms is a loooooong
time.
...and I don't speak a lick of Portuguese.
--
// Todd