Re: time() TIMER in seconds or just numbers
| From: | Igor Escobar | Date: | Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:51:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: time() TIMER in seconds or just numbers | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-290856@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Okey, but you understand the purpouse of it?
Igor Escobar
systems analyst & interface designer
www . igorescobar . com
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:42 PM, haliphax <haliphax@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Igor Escobar <titiolinkin@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The people use that to measure performance.
> >
> > If you're intersted about that read
> >
>
> http://www.igorescobar.com/blog/2009/03/05/benchmarking-de-desempenho-no-php/
> > (in portuguese, sorry)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Igor Escobar
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 1:05 PM, haliphax <haliphax@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Richard Heyes <richard@php.net>
> wrote:
> >> >> When someone does that, it means the execution time between $t1 and
> >> >> $t2...
> >> >
> >> > Is that for my benefit? Believe it or not, I do know the arcane art of
> >> > subtraction...
> >>
> >> I would subtract more often, but sacrificial farm animals and black
> >> candles are so hard to come by these days...
>
> Oh, I'm fully aware of what it's for. FYI, microtime() is probably
> more appropriate, since 1 full second in computer terms is a loooooong
> time.
>
> ...and I don't speak a lick of Portuguese.
>
>
> --
> // Todd
>