Re: CSS & tables
| From: | Robert Cummings | Date: | Sat, 16 May 2009 13:15:18 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: CSS & tables | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-292678@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 10:48 +0100, Ashley Sheridan wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-16 at 02:25 -0400, Paul M Foster wrote:
> > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 01:25:42PM -0400, PJ wrote:
> >
> > > I know of no better place to ask. This may not be strictly a PHP issue,
> > > but...
> > > I am busting my hump trying to format rather large input pages with CSS
> > > and trying to avoid tables; but it looks to me like I am wasting my time
> > > as positioning with CSS seems an impossibly tortuous exercise. I've
> > > managed to do some pages with CSS, but I feel like I am shooting myself
> > > in the foot or somewhere...
> > > Perhaps I am too demanding. I know that with tables, the formatting is
> > > ridiculously fast.
> > > Any thoughts, observations or recommendations?
> >
> > I think it's pretty telling that on a list of professionals who create
> > websites constantly, the overwhelming concensus is that for forms,
> > tables are the preferred solution.
> >
> > I liken this sort of discussion to the dichotomy between movie critics
> > and people who actually go and see movies. The critics inevitably have
> > all sorts of snobby things to say about the movies which are best
> > attended. I'm not sure why anyone listens to any critic on any subject.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > --
> > Paul M. Foster
> >
> I think the argument of tables vs css can go a little deeper too. These
> days, sites should not only be developed with good clean code that
> validates, but semantic markup. If your client doesn't like/know what
> this is, just give it to them in terms of seo!
FWIW, everything I've read indicates that tables don't affect SEO.
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP