Re: Re: sloppiness & stupidity
| From: | LinuxManMikeC | Date: | Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:29:38 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: sloppiness & stupidity | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-294195@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I don't know what validator you're using, but according to
http://validator.w3.org/ (as official as it gets) the
following
fragment is correct in HTML 4.01, HTML 5, XHTML 1.0 Strict, and XHTML
1.1:
<select>
<option selected="selected">test</option>
</select>
Thus sayeth the W3C, so let it be written, so let it be done. Go read
a tutorial on the transition to XHTML as well as XML.
2009/6/17 PJ <af.gourmet@videotron.ca>:
> Nisse Engström wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:18:09 +0100, "Ford, Mike" wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This is very true -- but XHTML requires *all* attributes to have a
>>> value, so an XHTML conformant page will use <select multiple="multiple"
>>> name="selector"> (or something similar such as <select
>>> multiple="yes"
>>> name="selector">). The only inconsistency here is that different people
>>> have chosen to validate against different standards.
>>>
>>
>> The multiple attribute only has one value: "multiple", so
>> it has to be <select multiple="multiple">. I don't think
>> "yes" cuts the mustard. In HTML, you can shorten it to
>> <select multiple>.
>>
> From my limited experience, and vast reading of those glorious 20,000
> entries on the Internet, multiple does not take a parameter. I had my
> fingers slapped once when I validated or something - multiple is just
> plain multiple ! :-P ;-) :-)
>
> --
> Hervé Kempf: "Pour sauver la planète, sortez du capitalisme."
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Phil Jourdan --- pj@ptahhotep.com
> http://www.ptahhotep.com
> http://www.chiccantine.com/andypantry.php
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>