Re: Re: sloppiness & stupidity
| From: | tedd | Date: | Thu, 18 Jun 2009 16:15:36 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: sloppiness & stupidity | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-294250@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
At 8:47 PM -0400 6/17/09, Robert Cummings wrote:
tedd wrote:Rob: It's by definition that case-sensitive is more specific than case-insensitive -- for example with respect to case-insensitive "selected", "SELECTED", and "SeLeCtEd" are all the same whereas case sensitive is more specific. Is this not true? Or do you have a different definition that states more variety is more specific? As far as using selected="selected" or selected="SELECTED", I prefer the latter -- but I don't think it makes much difference. Do you see otherwise? Cheers, tedd -- ------- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.comAs I understand it and is my experience, that is true -- a stand-alone HTML attribute should be equal to itself, such as selected="selected", or more specifically selected="SELECTED".How is that MORE specific? XHTML is like a cross-section of XML and HTML. It is case sensitive, so using an uppercase value in this context is LESS specific. Cheers,