Re: ORM doctrine

On Sunday, 12 December 2010, Tommy Pham <tommyhp2@gmail.com> wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Lester Caine [mailto:lester@lsces.co.uk] >> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 2:10 AM >> To: php-general List >> Subject: Re: [PHP] ORM doctrine >> >> Peter Lind wrote: >> > Your posts seem to indicate that caches are only useful when other >> > parts of the app have been done wrong. My point was that this is a >> > fairly fundamental misunderstanding of caches - regardless of what you >> > are or aren't capable of optimizing. >> >> CHACHES are only useful when there are static views of the information >> available. Only static elements can be cached with any real chance of >> performance improvement, so part of what Tommy is saying is correct. >> Although the way he has worded that is perhaps a little misleading? Possibly. However, thinking that a cache is something you apply at the end of development means you may well bar yourself from better uses of one. Ie. thinking that a cache is "icing on the cake" prohibits you from "mixing it into the cake" (to further abuse a metaphor) which could give you "a better recipe". I may have misunderstood the topic, but a cache to me is more than just storing views. It's also the db cache, memcache, apc, etc. You have to think about how you use these - some of them can't just be slapped on to your app after development. >> Data caching SHOULD always be the >> domain of the database, so duplicating that in PHP is pintless. So you're saying one should never use memcache for storing data from the db? Regards Peter -- <hype> WWW: plphp.dk / plind.dk LinkedIn: plind BeWelcome/Couchsurfing: Fake51 Twitter: kafe15 </hype>