Re: stupid (?) session question...

Christian Dechery wrote: > while I was trying to do some session stuff I realized it's much > simpler than in PHP... it doesn't have any session_start() or Meaning it's less flexible. You never browsed with cookie-warnings on, did you? Well, I always found it pretty annoying when some web-server wanted to set me some ASPSESSIONID____-cookie, with no apparent reason. Just someone who didn't know how to configure his IIS, obviously... > anything... and the session doesn't need to be "propagated"... I can > browse around pages that doesn't even mention sessions, I can even > leave the site, and when I'm back, the session is still there... I dunno, but can ASP do GET-Sessions instead of cookies? I would really recommend using them. Cookies suck. > how does this work? is this possible with PHP session handling, or > ASP really does have this advantage (or, who knows, disadvantage)??? What ASP does is simple session-handling with cookies. PHP can do better (cookies + get-fallback or get only). I have to admit that I don't really know what ASP can do, I just know that I got a lot of ASPSESSIONID____-cookies without even visiting a ASP-Page. regards Wagner -- The Aquinas Axiom: What the gods get away with, the cows don't.