Re: Re: [PHP] What would you like to see in most in a text editor?
| From: | Richard Quadling | Date: | Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:08:09 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [PHP] What would you like to see in most in a text editor? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-314843@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 14 September 2011 13:18, Tim Streater <tim@clothears.org.uk> wrote:
> On 14 Sep 2011 at 12:40, Richard Quadling <rquadling@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 14 September 2011 01:23, tamouse mailing lists
>> <tamouse.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Robert Cummings <robert@interjinn.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I'm a big fan of editors that work in the terminal.
>>>
>>> You'll get my emacs when you pry it out of my cold dead hands.
>>
>> Pah! You and your full screen editor.
>>
>> EDLIN is the way to go.
>
> Is that more or less terse than TECO?
>
> Back in 1989 when I was at SLAC, they were just getting into unix, and debates were raging
> about which editor to standardise on and teach people (emacs, vi, jove, etc). Because this
> wasn't settled, I started using notepad (and later, dxnotepad) and got on with coding. Six
> months later, the debates were still raging. I then had an epiphany: I'd been using notepad for
> six moths & got work done. It took me 5 minutes to find out how to use it. I didn't need
> teaching about it or to have a manual. So IMO, emacs, vi, and all their ilk belong in the dustbin of
> history.
>
> --
> Cheers -- Tim
>
TECO - OUCH.
--
Richard Quadling
Twitter : EE : Zend : PHPDoc
@RQuadling : e-e.com/M_248814.html : bit.ly/9O8vFY : bit.ly/lFnVea