Re: Phux - High Performance PHP Router

Here is the benchmark details, you can find the benchmark code below: https://github.com/c9s/router-benchmark on intel xeon 16 cores machine: symfony/routing only got 4873.17 #/sec while phux got 16777.12 #/sec on intel core i5 machine: symfony/routing only got around 200-300 #/sec while phux got around 1600-1800 #/sec Also the pure php dispatch benchmark: cat dispatch.txt n=10000 Runing symfony/routing - . 6664.4093423989/s Runing phux extension - . 16501.898328291/s Rate Mem phux extension symfony/routing phux extension 16K/s 5M -- -40% symfony/routing 6K/s 786K 247% -- ================================== Bar Chart ================================== phux extension 16K/s | ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ | symfony/routing 6K/s | ████████████████████████ | ============================== System Information ============================== PHP Version: 5.5.6 CPU Brand String: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400S CPU @ 2.50GHz On 2014/1/6, at 下午12:36, Yo-An lin <cornelius.howl@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah I know, the benchmark is pretty rough. Because its a two day work. :p > > The details will come up later. > > [Sent from iPhone] > > Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@gmail.com> 於 2014/1/6 7:54 寫道： > >> >> >> >> 2014/1/5 Lin Yo-An <cornelius.howl@gmail.com> >> Hi folks, >> >> >> Glad to announce that the first version of Phux PHP Router is released. >> >> https://github.com/c9s/phux >> >> >> Phux is basically a rewrite of PHP Roller router. >> >> Phux provides full functional C extension and pure PHP library with the >> same interface, so the extension is optional to install. >> >> but if you install phux extension, you may enjoy the performance of routing. >> >> >> >> Route Dispatch Benchmark (Symfony/Routing and Phux pure PHP) >> >> https://raw.github.com/c9s/Phux/master/benchmarks/reqs.png >> >> Hi, >> >> Not a comment about Phux directly, but I think I have to point this out (sadly: once more): >> When you use Apache Benchmark to benchmark the performance of an PHP-component, you in fact >> benchmark your system... [1] Another flaw is, that the whole benchmark setup is missing, which makes >> it slightly suspicious and unreliable. Two things, that spontanous came into my mind >> >> - Because you use ab to benchmark it is unlikely, that the S2-setup contains the >> routing-component only. This means, that in this benchmark you measure more than just the routing. >> OK, the README states, that "Testing with route dispatch only. (no controller)", but >> information on how do the benchmarks setup the routing is missing. >> - Like so many other benchmarks improvments, that every S2-application relies in production >> on, are probably missing. Do you compile the routing-table from a config into PHP? Do you use APC? >> While it sounds totally fair to compare two bare setups, it isn't. It probably ignores >> customizations, that are possible in one, but not the other and that affects the outcome. Most >> obvious example is what I mentioned: Parsing a YAML, generating the routing table and routing is >> something very different than reading the routing-table from an APC-cached PHP-file and routing. >> >> I don't say Phux is bad or something, but my advice is to rework the benchmark and >> publish the setup. Beside this I am more interested in benchmarks of the C-extension (especially >> against the native-PHP solution) :) >> >> Regards, >> Sebastian >> >> >> [1] The worst thing about this, is that you not only benchmark the target system, but the >> benchmark also relies heavily on the local one. Even worse than worse: Running both on the same >> machine let them affect each other in a non-predictable way. You get numbers, but you can never >> tell, what they mean. >> >> >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Yo-An Lin >> >> >> >> -- >> github.com/KingCrunch