Re: Phux - High Performance PHP Router

https://github.com/c9s/router-benchmark/blob/master/code/dispatch.txt Pure Dispatching Benchmark. I use LAP environment to test because the result is more practical for production environment. [Sent from iPhone] > Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@gmail.com> 於 2014/1/7 17:44 寫道： > > > > > 2014/1/6 Yo-An Lin <cornelius.howl@gmail.com> >> Here is the benchmark details, you can find the benchmark code below: >> >> https://github.com/c9s/router-benchmark > > Hi, > > Well, you still use a full LAMP-stack and HTTP-benchmark-tool for benchmarking. That was > actually _the_ point, which makes this benchmark useless for me... > > > Beside this: You should increase the routes you benchmark and introduce more variation > (pattern-matching, matching first/last route and so on), because different implementations often > differ in different situations. > >> >> on intel xeon 16 cores machine: >> >> symfony/routing only got 4873.17 #/sec while phux got 16777.12 #/sec >> >> on intel core i5 machine: >> >> symfony/routing only got around 200-300 #/sec while phux got around 1600-1800 #/sec >> >> >> >> Also the pure php dispatch benchmark: >> >> cat dispatch.txt >> n=10000 >> Runing symfony/routing - . 6664.4093423989/s >> Runing phux extension - . 16501.898328291/s >> >> Rate Mem phux extension symfony/routing >> phux extension 16K/s 5M -- -40% >> symfony/routing 6K/s 786K 247% -- >> >> >> ================================== Bar Chart ================================== >> >> phux extension 16K/s | >> ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ >> | >> symfony/routing 6K/s | >> ████████████████████████ | >> >> >> ============================== System Information ============================== >> >> PHP Version: 5.5.6 >> CPU Brand String: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400S CPU @ 2.50GHz >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 2014/1/6, at 下午12:36, Yo-An lin <cornelius.howl@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah I know, the benchmark is pretty rough. Because its a two day work. :p >>> >>> The details will come up later. >>> >>> [Sent from iPhone] >>> >>>> Sebastian Krebs <krebs.seb@gmail.com> 於 2014/1/6 7:54 寫道： >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 2014/1/5 Lin Yo-An <cornelius.howl@gmail.com> >>>>> Hi folks, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Glad to announce that the first version of Phux PHP Router is released.. >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/c9s/phux >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Phux is basically a rewrite of PHP Roller router. >>>>> >>>>> Phux provides full functional C extension and pure PHP library with the >>>>> same interface, so the extension is optional to install. >>>>> >>>>> but if you install phux extension, you may enjoy the performance of routing. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Route Dispatch Benchmark (Symfony/Routing and Phux pure PHP) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://raw.github.com/c9s/Phux/master/benchmarks/reqs.png >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Not a comment about Phux directly, but I think I have to point this out (sadly: >>>> once more): When you use Apache Benchmark to benchmark the performance of an PHP-component, you in >>>> fact benchmark your system... [1] Another flaw is, that the whole benchmark setup is missing, which >>>> makes it slightly suspicious and unreliable. Two things, that spontanous came into my mind >>>> >>>> - Because you use ab to benchmark it is unlikely, that the S2-setup contains the >>>> routing-component only. This means, that in this benchmark you measure more than just the routing. >>>> OK, the README states, that "Testing with route dispatch only. (no controller)", but >>>> information on how do the benchmarks setup the routing is missing. >>>> - Like so many other benchmarks improvments, that every S2-application relies in >>>> production on, are probably missing. Do you compile the routing-table from a config into PHP? Do you >>>> use APC? While it sounds totally fair to compare two bare setups, it isn't. It probably ignores >>>> customizations, that are possible in one, but not the other and that affects the outcome. Most >>>> obvious example is what I mentioned: Parsing a YAML, generating the routing table and routing is >>>> something very different than reading the routing-table from an APC-cached PHP-file and routing. >>>> >>>> I don't say Phux is bad or something, but my advice is to rework the benchmark >>>> and publish the setup. Beside this I am more interested in benchmarks of the C-extension (especially >>>> against the native-PHP solution) :) >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Sebastian >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] The worst thing about this, is that you not only benchmark the target system, >>>> but the benchmark also relies heavily on the local one. Even worse than worse: Running both on the >>>> same machine let them affect each other in a non-predictable way. You get numbers, but you can never >>>> tell, what they mean. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> Yo-An Lin >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> github.com/KingCrunch > > > > -- > github.com/KingCrunch