Re: Proposal for license change
| From: | Stuart Dallas | Date: | Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:15:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for license change | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-323137@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 3 Apr 2014, at 15:56, musicdenotation@gmail.com wrote:
> And since nobody owns PHP and it is intended to be truly open and accessible to all, does it
> even make sense to restrict use of the PHP name and require permission from an entity?
> In any case, may the US and UK trademark laws protect you. :)
Why does this matter so much to you? Are you so desperate to call your product/project "PHP
Whatever" that you really can’t accept that the PHP licence is not an accident?
As far as I know that clause exists to prevent any confusion over whether PHP (i.e. the community)
has had any input in to or has endorsed a particular product/project. It’s that simple. And the
only reason I can think of (which doesn’t in any way mean it’s the only reason that exists) for
why you care so much is that you want to imply such a connection.
-Stuart
--
Stuart Dallas
3ft9 Ltd
http://3ft9.com/
>> On Apr 3, 2014, at 20:26, Rasmus Lerdorf <rasmus@lerdorf.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 04/02/2014 06:54 PM, Kris Craig wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Sharon Levy <slevy1@pipeline.com> wrote:
>>>> Why does the PHP project continue to be without any kind of corporate
>>>> sponsorship in contrast to the opensource project Ubuntu which is backed by
>>>> Canonical? If the PHP project were to have a company supporting it,
>>>> wouldn't it be better protected? And, with a company backing it wouldn't
>>>> the issue of acquiring a trademark then be feasible?
>>
>>> And if the company's shareholders decide they want PHP to go in a certain
>>> direction, what then? I'm not necessarily opposed to the idea. It just
>>> makes me really, really nervous. I'm not sure a trademark and funding
>>> would be worth giving-up our independence.
>>
>> Right, not being beholden to any sort of corporate entity is very much
>> on purpose. Nobody "owns" PHP and at the same time we all "own" PHP.
>> That is the only way to keep PHP truly open and accessible to all, for
>> better or worse.
>> I also think you underestimate the hassle involved in getting (and
>> protecting) a Madrid-protocol international trademark for a 3-letter term.
>>
>> -Rasmus
>>
>> --
>> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
>> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>