Re: Proposal for license change
| From: | Ian | Date: | Thu, 03 Apr 2014 15:45:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for license change | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-323138@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 03/04/2014 16:15, Stuart Dallas wrote:
> On 3 Apr 2014, at 15:56, musicdenotation@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> And since nobody owns PHP and it is intended to be truly open and accessible to all, does
>> it even make sense to restrict use of the PHP name and require permission from an entity?
>> In any case, may the US and UK trademark laws protect you. :)
>
> Why does this matter so much to you? Are you so desperate to call your product/project
> "PHP Whatever" that you really can’t accept that the PHP licence is not an accident?
>
> As far as I know that clause exists to prevent any confusion over whether PHP (i.e. the
> community) has had any input in to or has endorsed a particular product/project. It’s that simple.
> And the only reason I can think of (which doesn’t in any way mean it’s the only reason that
> exists) for why you care so much is that you want to imply such a connection.
>
> -Stuart
>
Hi,
Do a Google search for 'musicdenotation@gmail.com license change' and
you will find many more projects have been the target of such license
change requests.
So come on, what's your motivation?
Ian
--