Re: PEAR Standards (was Re: equivalent of asp's <%= strTest %>)

On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Dean Hall wrote: > "Michael Kimsal" <michael@note.themusicguide.com> wrote in message > > news:Pine.LNX.4.05.10104071820450.3267-100000@note.themusicguide.com... > > I'm not sure why XML is an issue. Does XML use the ? in it's syntax? XML > > tags are, to my knowledge, of the <blah><blah/> style. Am I missing > > something? I admit it's been a bit since I've gotten into dealing with > > XML at any real in-depth level, but the short tags in PHP don't seem like > > they'd be a problem. If they're a problem for PHP, I think a lot of ASP > > shops will be caught short when dealing with XML. > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > This is the first line of an XML file. Including XML files from PHP scripts > will be a real problem if short tags are enabled. > > Dean Hall. > http://hall.apt7.com DUH! :( Why did those pesky XML people have to do that??? All of that cool header stuff is stuff I normally skip - like the ISO charset stuff that WYSIWYG editors are fond of putting at the top of every file they create. :) And oh yeah, I realized my ASP comment mistake about 4 seconds after hitting send... Not a good mailing day for me today! ;)