Re: PEAR Standards (was Re: equivalent of asp's <%= strTest %>)

From: Date: Sun, 08 Apr 2001 21:18:17 +0000
Subject: Re: PEAR Standards (was Re: equivalent of asp's <%= strTest %>)
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-47597@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
I'm pretty sure you can make php use the asp style % though too, not sure if that's for short tags, regular tags or both, I know it's in the config though, anyone know? Shaun On Saturday 07 April 2001 18:46, Michael Kimsal wrote: > On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Dean Hall wrote: > > "Michael Kimsal" <michael@note.themusicguide.com> wrote in message > > > > news:Pine.LNX.4.05.10104071820450.3267-100000@note.themusicguide.com... > > > > > I'm not sure why XML is an issue. Does XML use the ? in it's syntax? > > > XML tags are, to my knowledge, of the <blah><blah/> style. Am I > > > missing something? I admit it's been a bit since I've gotten into > > > dealing with XML at any real in-depth level, but the short tags in PHP > > > don't seem like they'd be a problem. If they're a problem for PHP, I > > > think a lot of ASP shops will be caught short when dealing with XML. > > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > > > This is the first line of an XML file. Including XML files from PHP > > scripts will be a real problem if short tags are enabled. > > > > Dean Hall. > > http://hall.apt7.com > > DUH! :( Why did those pesky XML people have to do that??? > All of that cool header stuff is stuff I normally skip - like the ISO > charset stuff that WYSIWYG editors are fond of putting at the top of every > file they create. :) > > > And oh yeah, I realized my ASP comment mistake about 4 seconds after > hitting send... > > Not a good mailing day for me today! ;)

« previous php.general (#47597) next »