Re: PEAR Standards (was Re: equivalent of asp's <%= strTest %>)
| From: | shaun | Date: | Sun, 08 Apr 2001 21:18:17 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR Standards (was Re: equivalent of asp's <%= strTest %>) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-47597@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
I'm pretty sure you can make php use the asp style % though too, not sure if
that's for short tags, regular tags or both, I know it's in the config
though, anyone know?
Shaun
On Saturday 07 April 2001 18:46, Michael Kimsal wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Dean Hall wrote:
> > "Michael Kimsal" <michael@note.themusicguide.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:Pine.LNX.4.05.10104071820450.3267-100000@note.themusicguide.com...
> >
> > > I'm not sure why XML is an issue. Does XML use the ? in it's syntax?
> > > XML tags are, to my knowledge, of the <blah><blah/> style. Am I
> > > missing something? I admit it's been a bit since I've gotten into
> > > dealing with XML at any real in-depth level, but the short tags in PHP
> > > don't seem like they'd be a problem. If they're a problem for PHP, I
> > > think a lot of ASP shops will be caught short when dealing with XML.
> >
> > <?xml version="1.0"?>
> >
> > This is the first line of an XML file. Including XML files from PHP
> > scripts will be a real problem if short tags are enabled.
> >
> > Dean Hall.
> > http://hall.apt7.com
>
> DUH! :( Why did those pesky XML people have to do that???
> All of that cool header stuff is stuff I normally skip - like the ISO
> charset stuff that WYSIWYG editors are fond of putting at the top of every
> file they create. :)
>
>
> And oh yeah, I realized my ASP comment mistake about 4 seconds after
> hitting send...
>
> Not a good mailing day for me today! ;)