Re: Re: include_once vs require_once

Yes, this is essentially true. Zeev posted this to the list awhile ago, see the following : http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/6/ Essentially the difference now is the type of error that's produced, one being a warning (include) while the other being FATAL! (require). Regards, Philip On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, CC Zona wrote: > In article <B78CC02E.F4D9%php-l@bakednotfried.com>, > php-l@bakednotfried.com (Mike Cullerton) wrote: > > > so the difference is _when_ they happen. > > > > ok, another question then. > > > > if my script includes the line > > require_once($file); > > > > and $file contains the line > > include_once($other_file); > > > > what happens then? > > Rasmus has stated before that there is no longer any difference between > include_once() vs. require_once(), or include() vs. require(). I forget > which version that became the case, but if you are using a current version > of PHP the above two lines should produce identical results. > > -- > CC > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net > For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net > To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net >