Re: Re: include_once vs require_once

Perhaps the manual should be made to reflect this since, my understanding came from the online version of the manual. Sterling Philip Olson wrote:

Yes, this is essentially true. Zeev posted this to the list awhile ago, see the following : http://www.faqts.com/knowledge_base/view.phtml/aid/6/ Essentially the difference now is the type of error that's produced, one being a warning (include) while the other being FATAL! (require). Regards, Philip On Tue, 31 Jul 2001, CC Zona wrote:

In article <B78CC02E.F4D9%php-l@bakednotfried.com>, php-l@bakednotfried.com (Mike Cullerton) wrote:

so the difference is _when_ they happen. ok, another question then. if my script includes the line require_once($file); and $file contains the line include_once($other_file); what happens then?

Rasmus has stated before that there is no longer any difference between include_once() vs. require_once(), or include() vs. require(). I forget which version that became the case, but if you are using a current version of PHP the above two lines should produce identical results. -- CC -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, e-mail: php-general-unsubscribe@lists.php.net For additional commands, e-mail: php-general-help@lists.php.net To contact the list administrators, e-mail: php-list-admin@lists.php.net