RE: [PHP] Re: PHP in corporate settings?
| From: | billfarr at ages dot com | Date: | Fri, 10 Aug 2001 16:33:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP] Re: PHP in corporate settings? | ||
| Groups: | php.general | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-62190@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Evan:
Thanks 'n' a tip o'the hat!
<grin> I certainly have no problem evangelising, especially for something
that actually WORKS as documented. How do the authors feel about the idea
of evangelising? How best to consolidate support round those who created,
maintain, and document PHP? The best approach, I think, is to lock ranks
together round those gentles and offer our support and contributions toward
an effort of making the marketplace more PHP-aware.
Personally, I'd like nothing better than to see a safe, secure,
fully-featured toolkit-to-success like PHP outshine IIS/ASP in glossy print.
Fact for fact, feature-for-feature comparisons, extolling the richness of
PHP as opposed to ASP, praising the documentation: a side-by-side comparison
tells the whole story. No offence to Perl programmers (I count myself as
one, sometimes :-) but there are appropriate places for rich, intelligent
scripting languages and then there's the web with its own rules. Mind, I
rely heavily on Perl, but it does things like keep mirror servers mirrored,
watch over NFS mounts (I'm running 4 VPN's to sites in N America and
Netherlands), and generally keeping the shop together. But it's PITA to use
for interactive, EBusiness-type web stuff. PHP (to me) seems much more
appropriate and easy to use.
Ok, we could toss a barb or two in the ads like "If you'd used Apache/PHP
instead of IIS/ASP your network wouldn't be shut down due to Code Red today"
just for schitzengiggles. But just one or two :-) I'd hate to suffer a
loss of credibility due to appearing to be strident about it. M$ people
being shrill about the virtues of M$ to me is the biggest turnoff about ASP
or any other M$ product: not necessarily the shoddy workmanship of M$ in
general. (You can tell I run a strictly ABM [anything but Microsoft] shop.)
And Lord knows, if a shyte product like SAP can get TV airtime and corporate
notice (even though after 2 years of tracking installs I've YET to hear of
an implementation success story--I have loads of disaster stories) and
zillions of dollars in revenue (do we smell a scam?), a LEGITIMATE,
works-as-promised product like PHP should have little problem gaining notice
with a few good advert placements. One would hope. Oftimes, the corporate
marketplace seems to have a taste for doodoo and there's little one can do
about that except keep plugging.
Ladies and gentlemen: any further thoughts? A good product deserves good
recognition. Any strong marketing/psychologist types out there with some
ideas how to put forth PHP's strengths without sounding shrill? Any ideas
from the PHP authors/contributors/caretakers?
Evan, good show on the site to collect contacts to support the idea of
promoting PHP as a much better, safer, richer alternative. A central
rallying point is always a good start.
-B
-----Original Message-----
From: Evan Nemerson [mailto:evan@coeus-group.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2001 9:04 PM
To: Bill Farrell; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP in corporate settings?
Bill has hit it right on! Programmers all over the world have already
recognized that PHP is a superior language, and open-source is not the root
of all evil (as M$ would have us believe). However, many (most?) execs do
not
listen to reason, but rather only to TV and glossy ads. Therefore, I propose
we fight fire with fire!
Lets band together and form a web site not altogether unlike LinuxFund.org.
However, instead of development of new technology, our site could focus on
the spread of PHP, or perhaps open source technology. Get our own credit
card, ask for donations, be those donations money or time.
We could use this money to fund ad-campaigns. Ad-campaigns targeted not at
programmers who already know the merit of PHP (and open-source in general),
but rather the "Big Corporate Executive" who has the power to make or break
PHP.
The ads could go in magazines like Forbes, Fortune, etc. instead of Open
Magazine.
If you are interested in this, either helping make the site, providing
expertise in other areas (such as marketing), or would just be willing to
make a donation, visit a page I just set up:
http://www.coeus-group.com/AdCamp.php .
I'll consider this post to be a kind
of market analysis. I sincerly hope that you are as interested- and willing-
as I.
Evan Nemerson
evan@coeus-group.com