Re: Netscape vs. Explorer rendering
| From: | nastySprite | Date: | Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:34:02 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Netscape vs. Explorer rendering | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-7953@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"idban secandri" <idban@satunet.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:20000725021418.A5727@satunet.com...
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 02:37:14PM -0400, Eric Wood wrote:
> >Things look better in Explorer than do in Netscape, yet Netscape is more
> >strict on HTML syntax.
>
> if run on netscape i garantee run on other browser, but if run well on IE
i cannot garantee run well on other browser ( i.e you forgot TAG <form>, or
incomplete TAG <table> )
well if I write well-formed valid code I can guarantee it will run on any
compliant user-agent.
That's my criterion...
> >Is there a web site that explains the differences between how the two
treat
> >certain parts of code?
>
> may be w3c.org
Nope. It's not w3c's task to supervise how their standards are supported.
I don't know what exactly you are searching for, but you could try and visit
http://css.nu/pointers/bugs.html
http://webreview.com/wr/pub/guides/style/notes.html
and perhaps
http://webstandards.org/
maybe even
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/standards/dude02072000.asp
and
http://msdn.microsoft.com/standards/top150/web.asp
Regards,
Mike