Re: What's more common: CGI or module installation?
| From: | David Robley | Date: | Tue, 01 Aug 2000 04:52:19 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: What's more common: CGI or module installation? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-9352@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 31 Jul, Murph wrote:
> I suppose I should reiterate that I'm trying to help out my father whose
> server doesn't have PHP on it. So, he's stuck with flat HTML files. I'd like
> to help him write interactive HTML files that would flow something like:
>
>
> Read Daddy's page one halfway
> \
> \
> Enter me with fat, greasy PHP script
> /
> /
> Daddy's Page One (other half) with PHP content
>
>
> Kind of like sticking a CGI script in there that reads back into his
> original Page One.
>
Lets get this straight - you want www.dads.server/page1.html to include
something from your server? and www.dads.server doesn't have any
scripting tool?
It sounds like www.dads.server would need to redirect to your php page,
which would then need to open www.dads.server/page1.html and read it,
output the first part of it, do your scripting and then output the
balance of his html page. I think.
--
David Robley | WEBMASTER & Mail List Admin
RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INJURY STUDIES | http://www.nisu.flinders.edu.au/
AusEinet | http://auseinet.flinders.edu.au/
Flinders University, ADELAIDE, SOUTH AUSTRALIA