Re: Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish?

From: Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 03:05:21 +0000
Subject: Re: Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish?
References: 1  Groups: php.general 
Request: Send a blank email to php-general+get-98613@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
hiya, twofish runs at just over 25MB/sec when compiled into a test VC++ application, blowfish runs at 18MB/sec. As far as I remember, if you use the same keylenght (256 or 128) then you should get around the same level of encryption (probably not exact, but if one was that much weaker there'd be a warning on the Mcrypt page). HTH, Dw Sqlcoders.com Dynamic data driven web solutions ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jimmy Lantz" <jimmy.lantz@lusidor.com> To: <php-general@lists.php.net> Sent: May 21 2002 09:27 AM Subject: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? > Hi, > started playing with Mcrypt and just wanted to ask which encryption method > makes the stronger encryption? > (I can supply the necesary keylength). > Should I go for MCRYPT_BLOWFISH or MCRYPT_TWOFISH? Or no fish at all :) > > So what do I need it for? I'm going to use it encrypting files, sizes > varies between some 100 k's and 4-5 mb's. > / Jim > > Paranoia + A system w/o users = Safe system :) > > > -- > PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php > >

« previous php.general (#98613) next »