Re: Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish?
| From: | Thalis A. Kalfigopoulos | Date: | Tue, 21 May 2002 18:08:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.general |
| Request: | Send a blank email to php-general+get-98622@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 21 May 2002, Jimmy Lantz wrote:
> Hi,
> started playing with Mcrypt and just wanted to ask which encryption method
> makes the stronger encryption?
> (I can supply the necesary keylength).
> Should I go for MCRYPT_BLOWFISH or MCRYPT_TWOFISH? Or no fish at all :)
>
> So what do I need it for? I'm going to use it encrypting files, sizes
> varies between some 100 k's and 4-5 mb's.
> / Jim
>
> Paranoia + A system w/o users = Safe system :)
I'd suggest you went for neither. Rijndael is the AES (http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/aes/)
block cypher of choice. You can take it all the way up to 256 and its a standard. Of course that can
mean one of two things: it was approved either because it can be broken, or because it is infact
good. How paranoid are you 8-)
I don't know though how fast it is.
More online at http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/~rijmen/rijndael/
cheers,
thalis
>
>
> --
> PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>