Re: Beta Release?

Em Sáb, 2007-03-03 às 09:19 -0800, Andrei Zmievski escreveu: > On Mar 2, 2007, at 7:29 AM, Anant Narayanan wrote: > > > I think it's time we had a beta release. We're at 94.01% overall > > coverage (including the Scintilla and SourceView extensions) [1]; and > > have a significant number of new features/extensions since the alpha > > release; most importantly custom Tree models. > > Before we make another release, I think we should make sure there > aren't any extant bugs. For example, there's still the cloning crash > that Pablo described. I replied saying that we may not be able to > support cloning due to complicated structure of internal Gtk+ > objects, but I haven't heard anything back. Are there other bugs we > are aware of? I'm activelly using php-gtk2 since its first release. I don't remember of any other bug like the clone support. Just when using php-gtk2 on windows the set_cursor() method from GdkWindow has a weird behavior, but I'm not sure it's a Gtk problem or the underling environment... I'm not sure but I guess it gives me a warning when I use pair numbers... in a loop from 1 to 255... $gdkwindow->set_cursor(new GdkCursor(68)); Pablo > > > However, before we go about it, we'll have to decide on whether to > > include the following: > > > > 1) 2.8/2.10 Support. Elizabeth has provided patches for this, and the > > build system will automatically build the latest version found on the > > system. I've extended this to work on Linux and OSX. > > I'm fine with this as long as we make it clear in our builds which > version they support. We should also encourage developers to > explicitly check for the Gtk+ version in their applications. > > > 2) The GtkHTML3 and libsexy extensions. > > Sure, these can be included (just the bindings, right?). > > > 4) Move to native Scintilla (Tom's Scintilla) instead of GtkScintilla. > > This one's on me and I'll get around to it soon enough. > > I would appreciate it. > > It seems that our TODO2 list is somewhat out of date. Could people > please look at the Classes and Functions section and remove the items > that have been implemented? > > -Andrei >