Re: Re: [php-gtk-cvs] cvs: php-gtk / config.m4 /demos/examples properties.php /ext/gtk+ gtk.overrides gtktreeview.overrides php_gtk+_types.c
phpg_custom_tree_model.c /main php_gtk.c php_gtk.h php_gtk_util.c phpg_closure.c phpg_gobject.c phpg_gtype.c phpg_gvalue.c phpg_paramspec.c
phpg_support.c

From: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 18:16:59 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [php-gtk-cvs] cvs: php-gtk / config.m4 /demos/examples properties.php /ext/gtk+ gtk.overrides gtktreeview.overrides php_gtk+_types.c
phpg_custom_tree_model.c /main php_gtk.c php_gtk.h php_gtk_util.c phpg_closure.c phpg_gobject.c phpg_gtype.c phpg_gvalue.c phpg_paramspec.c
phpg_support.c
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.gtk.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-3952@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Like I replied to Anant, my only concern is that __get_property and __set_property might be used by PHP itself in the future.. -Andrei http://10fathoms.org/vu - daily photoblog Elizabeth Smith wrote:
Anant Narayanan wrote:
Hi Andrei,
So, any comments on custom type registration? I'm working on signals next.
Looks fine on first glance, however I'm not sure about the do_set_ and do_get_property method names as well as the $__gproperties property name. Naming nuances aside, great work! -- Anant
Those names are similiar to the conventions in other languages, so I think they're fine - although I would have preferred __get_property and __set_property - so people understand these are "php magic methods" but whatever ;)


« previous php.gtk.dev (#3952) next »