Re: Re: [php-gtk-cvs] cvs: php-gtk / config.m4 /demos/examples properties.php /ext/gtk+ gtk.overrides gtktreeview.overrides php_gtk+_types.c
phpg_custom_tree_model.c /main php_gtk.c php_gtk.h php_gtk_util.c phpg_closure.c phpg_gobject.c phpg_gtype.c phpg_gvalue.c phpg_paramspec.c
phpg_support.c

From: Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 20:38:04 +0000
Subject: Re: Re: [php-gtk-cvs] cvs: php-gtk / config.m4 /demos/examples properties.php /ext/gtk+ gtk.overrides gtktreeview.overrides php_gtk+_types.c
phpg_custom_tree_model.c /main php_gtk.c php_gtk.h php_gtk_util.c phpg_closure.c phpg_gobject.c phpg_gtype.c phpg_gvalue.c phpg_paramspec.c
phpg_support.c
References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Groups: php.gtk.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to php-gtk-dev+get-3955@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Okay. What about signal class closures? __do_*? Elizabeth Smith wrote:
Anant Narayanan wrote:
On 19-Sep-07, at 11:46 PM, Andrei Zmievski wrote:
Like I replied to Anant, my only concern is that __get_property and __set_property might be used by PHP itself in the future..
Let's go in for __get_gproperty and __set_gproperty then? -- Anant
Actually that sounds good to me! follows the standard of using the g as a prefix, and the php standard of underscores for magic ;)


« previous php.gtk.dev (#3955) next »