Re: Re: 2.0.1 Dependency Hell, was:2.0.1 issue: complains about missing gtkhtml.3.0.dll

> Of course I did restart, since I know that changing just about anything > in Windows without following up with a reboot is likely to produce flaky > results. Experience gained from god knows how many win2k and winxp > desktop machine rebuilds... > > I'll be trying 2.0.1 on one of my spare win2k machines... they never had > gnope or GIMP (another possible source of gtk runtime in path), though > both have php-gtk 2.0 beta. I'll just replace the 2.0 beta with the 2.0.1 > and see what happens and let you know. Might be a few days before I get > back. I need gd2, mbstring, and mysqli so I might run into some issues. > > Cheers, Ah, yes, I would say it's GIMP, because it does put a global gtk install in path. The other issue is I'm not sure how good the support for windows 2000 is for GTK anymore, they've made a lot of changes in the 2.12 series - theoretically it should work, but windows is known for blowing up.... Thanks, Elizabeth