Re: Re: 2.0.1 Dependency Hell, was:2.0.1 issue: complains about missing gtkhtml.3.0.dll

On 29 May 2008 at 8:28, Elizabeth M Smith wrote: > > Ah, yes, I would say it's GIMP, because it does put a global gtk install > in path. The other issue is I'm not sure how good the support for windows > 2000 is for GTK anymore, they've made a lot of changes in the 2.12 series > - theoretically it should work, but windows is known for blowing up.... I don't think win2k is the issue, as it's basically winxp without the frilly dress and the makeup. Anything that works on winxp should work on win2k. E.g. I often bump into hardware that does not have win2k specific drivers, so I use the winxp driver. Never had any problems. However, I have run into instances where bad coding has given me grief. I recall some software that had the windows dir hardcoded as 'C:\WINDOWS'. Of course, it would not run on win2k. But I really don't think the gtk people are *that* stupid ;-) cheers -- André =========================================================== Black Holes were created when God divided by zero.