Re: A validator module for PHP7
| From: | Yasuo Ohgaki | Date: | Mon, 11 Sep 2017 21:49:06 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: A validator module for PHP7 | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-100527@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:39 AM, Yasuo Ohgaki <yohgaki@ohgaki.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 6:35 AM, lists@rhsoft.net <lists@rhsoft.net>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 11.09.2017 um 23:07 schrieb Yasuo Ohgaki
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:22 AM, Stephen Reay <php-lists@koalephant.com
>>> >
>>>
>>>> So, you still didn’t actually provide an example. I *guess* you’re
>>>> talking
>>>> about character class validation or something else equally “simple”,
>>>> because I can’t imagine what else would be a common enough case that
>>>> you’d
>>>> want to have built-in rules for, and that you wouldn’t internally use
>>>> RegExp to test anyway.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Your request is like "Devil's Proof". Example code that cannot do things
>>> with existing API cannot exist with meaningful manner. It can be
>>> explained
>>> why it cannot, though. Try what "validate" string validator can do,
>>> Then you'll see.
>>>
>>> There is no STRING validation filter currently. This fact alone,
>>> it could be said "filter cannot do string validation currently".
>>>
>>> List of problems in current validation filter
>>>
>> but you still fail to explain why in the world you don#t try to enhance
>> the existing filter functions instead invent a new beast leading finally to
>> have the existin filter functions and your new stuff which share the same
>> intention
>>
>>
> Why don't you read previous RFC and the vote result?
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/add_validate_functions_to_filter
>
I'm a bit surprised by the fact there are "filter improvement" supporters.
You should have participated in the previous RFC discussion.
Regards,
--
Yasuo Ohgaki
yohgaki@ohgaki.net