Re: Mailing list moderation
| From: | Sanford Whiteman | Date: | Wed, 03 Jan 2018 09:55:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Mailing list moderation | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-101502@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Tony, you have a point in the sense that a proposed Code of Conduct --
which would have been binding on posts to lists @php.net -- provoked a
fiery debate (to put it mildly) and was eventually withdrawn
(http://news.php.net/php.internals/90726).
The dominant objections to the CoC did not focus on relatively
apolitical cases like calling someone a habitual liar or implying
non-augmented humans can write bug-free code. Yet the point remains
that there is no doc whose letter or spirit can be debated, AFAIK.
As Stas points out, having a CoC for the list would not be a free
speech issue in the wider sense. But in the *absence* of such a
yardstick, I do agree with you that there's nothing to justify
ejecting you from the list.
You obviously love using PHP and do not come here simply to bash the
language (to me, that would be grounds for ejection because one would
not legitimately be joining the community, in essence a spam signup).
While I don't agree with your technical viewpoint in the recent flame
war, perhaps you do still have the right to express it here without
fear of suspension/ejection.
But consider this takeaway: while you may not realize it since you're
in too deep at present, the (scalar-pseudo-type-related) war you're
currently in with the other fellow has devolved into silliness.
Neither of you are in my killfile; more the reverse, as it's become so
over-the-top that it's funny.
I know, though, that you take this topic seriously -- but the way
things are going are entirely comedic, with accusations of fabulism (I
don't know where that's from) met by accusations of lack of coding
skill (just as unlikely for a longtime Internals participant).
Assuming you'd rather we take the technical aspects of the debate
seriously, for that reason alone it's worth a reset and a rethink.
—— S.