Re: Re: Mailing list moderation
| From: | Christoph M. Becker | Date: | Wed, 04 Apr 2018 23:56:34 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Mailing list moderation | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-102024@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 05.04.2018 at 00:12, Rowan Collins wrote:
> On 4 April 2018 22:44:56 BST, "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> While I most certainly don't like the sometimes explicit and/or
>> aggressive language used by Harald, I consider him a valuable bug
>> reporter nonetheless[1].
>>
>> [1]
>>
>> <https://bugs.php.net/search.php?search_for=&boolean=0&limit=30&order_by=&direction=DESC&cmd=display&status=All&bug_type=All&project=All&php_os=&phpver=&cve_id=&assign=&author_email=spam2%40rhsoft.net&bug_age=0&bug_updated=0&commented_by=>
>
> I just sorted that list by status, and of 111 bugs, 27 are closed as "not a bug", 6
> "won't fix", and 2 were detected as spam, including one with the intriguing title
> " PHP >= 5.6.0 is broken by definition".
However, 27 reports have been closed (I'm assuming they have been valid
and have been resolved), a few are analyzed or assigned, and there are a
lot of still open tickets, which may be valid or not.
> There may be some genuinely useful reports in there, and even some of the not-a-bugs might not
> be awful, but is it really a list we can't do without, for the sake of not scaring everyone
> else away?
Indeed, that is the question! (A follow-up question might be how to
block somebody from the bugtracker, since to my knowledge one could
state basically arbitrary email addresses).
Quoting spam2 at rhsoft dot net from <https://bugs.php.net/76184>:
| […] but i prefer the Torvalds style
Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi. :)
--
Christoph M. Becker