Re: Re: PHP 7.3 zif_handler changes
| From: | Derick Rethans | Date: | Mon, 23 Jul 2018 09:44:11 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: PHP 7.3 zif_handler changes | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-102959@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 10 Jul 2018, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 09.07.2018 at 11:41, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> >
> >> On 04.07.2018 at 12:24, Nikita Popov wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Christoph M. Becker <cmbecker69@gmx.de>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 04.07.2018 at 01:16, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Another one: some extensioms suffer from the fact that the macro GC_G
> >>>>> was removed from
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/php/php-src/blob/master/Zend/zend_gc.h
> >>>>> Some of the removed functionality has been reintroduced in gc_status
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/php/php-src/commits/master/Zend/zend_gc.h
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Examples using GC_G: v8js, xdebug, tideways.
> >>>>> v8js was using gc_active to check if garbage collection was running.
> >>>>> I did a wild guess to fix it:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://github.com/Jan-E/v8js/commit/997df065d3cd06a9b11e399458c391
> >>>> eb797a850e#diff-dc446a69201ccda44a33d111152f6c8c
> >>>>
> >>>> This looks wrong, since zend_gc_collect_cycles() actually triggers the
> >>>> GC, if I'm not mistaken.
> >>>>
> >>>> It seems to me that should be something like:
> >>>>
> >>>> zend_gc_status status;
> >>>> zend_gc_get_status(&status);
> >>>> if (status.runs) {
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> The correct way to handle this is to implement a proper get_gc() handler,
> >>> which will be called in favor of get_properties() during GC.
> >>
> >> Ah, thanks! In some other cases, for instance, in Xdebug[1], using
> >> zend_gc_get_status() would be correct, wouldn't it?
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >> <https://github.com/xdebug/xdebug/blob/27e20b16d23ab611d2a8e74d2e3c061710e18d8f/xdebug_gc_stats.c#L47-L57>
> >
> > It should be - care to make a patch? :-) Xdebug also doesn't do the hash
> > protections correctly yet. I've not had the time to make a fix for that
> > yet either (hint!) ;-)
>
> I'm already working on that. I'll submit a (partial?) PR ASAP.
I've see that patch, but it needs a fair bit more work that I've started
on. Once it all compiles, and works, I'll merge it including your
commit.
cheers,
Derick
--
https://derickrethans.nl | https://xdebug.org | https://dram.io
Like Xdebug? Consider a donation: https://xdebug.org/donate.php,
or become my Patron: https://www.patreon.com/derickr
twitter: @derickr and @xdebug