Re: [RFC] Alternative "use" syntax for Closures
| From: | M. W. Moe | Date: | Sun, 16 Jun 2019 01:01:28 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Alternative "use" syntax for Closures | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-105948@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello,
if you are upset; it's not the place here; your argument is efficiently
based on problems of indentation and handling commas
properly.
Moreover, but not least, you have no idea what a lambda is; if we admit it
what you propose; that is not feasible in PHP; why? because it would
require a preprocessor; in the case presented, it would be necessary to
import all that existing scope then making a selection; nobody wants that
to happen.
If you do not accept any rational criticism; you should think of doing
something else; I do not know; gardening maybe? who knows.
P.S For my use of the "closure" you made a fool yourself beyond what you
can grasp; but anyhow, my dear, it's refreshing, you made smile.
On Sat, Jun 15, 2019 at 4:34 PM Wes <netmo.php@gmail.com> wrote:
> Welcome to the first inevitable patronizing message... No, my code is not
> smelly. If something is smelling for you, check your armpits.
> Importing 4 variables is not rare. If you think it's rare and should be
> done differently, maybe you should first actually do something with
> Closures before telling people they are wrong.
> And if you use actual names instead of "$var1" or "T1" you will see why I
> am proposing to move the lexical imports where they are the least invasive.
>