Re: [RFC] Alternative "use" syntax for Closures

> On Jun 17, 2019, at 12:50, Mark Randall <markyr@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 17/06/2019 15:40, Ben Ramsey wrote: >>> Where "use (...)" would auto-capture all of the used variables in a similar >>> manner to short closures, that would certainly save a bit of time. > >> Would this mean that all variables in the “parent" are now available in the >> “child?” This seems like it could result in some unexpected surprises as scope “leaks” >> across these boundaries. > > Just the ones which are used, like short closures. I see. So it would figure it out based on scope and only use those variables that are explicitly used. This is somewhat similar to the way $this works in closures today. I think I would be okay with this functionality, especially if this is how short closures work. -Ben

Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc