Re: Vote: Straw poll for P++ feasibility
| From: | sergey at s-panteleev dot ru | Date: | Wed, 14 Aug 2019 15:54:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Vote: Straw poll for P++ feasibility | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-106608@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi!
my 2c:
As I understood, Zeev said about two camps: ones want to make PHP more strict, others – not.
Maybe, is more productive to discuss the general direction of PHP (it will be a strict road or not)
instead of 4 months disputes about short open tags, or sisters language or other derivative
things?
IMHO, if there is a single direction, many disputes will disappear by themselves
—
Sincerely,
Sergey Panteleev
Telegram: @saundefined
E-mail: sergey@s-panteleev.ru
On 14 Aug 2019, 18:27 +0300, Sara Golemon <pollita@php.net>, wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 10:14 AM Derick Rethans <derick@php.net> wrote:
>
> > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/p-plus-plus
> >
> > To follow up my no vote; What I'm against is splitting the language on
> hard boundaries that never disappear, only widen. I'm also a 'No' on
> Editions, but slightly less of a 'No', and possibly a 'Yes', if those
> editions are clearly intended to fade over time.
>
> -Sara