Re: [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2)
| From: | M. W. Moe | Date: | Tue, 08 Oct 2019 23:58:56 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] Deprecate Backtick Operator (V2) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-107448@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hello,
the point Stanislav is really not about whom; that's about thinking, work,
effort, personal walk thru a problem;
and I am sorry he is fully right; live example:
"I think that's been inconsistencies from the part of early contributors
which is the same reason we are having "haystack and needle" problem and
I'm not sure there's a problem fixing those old days mistake."
is this embodiment of arrogance, vulgarity hence stupidity because to me
they are synonyms helps anyone?
Regards.
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:39 PM Mark Randall <marandall@php.net> wrote:
> On 09/10/2019 00:26, Stanislav Malyshev wrote:
> > That's part of the problem. RFC should be for something that is
> > necessary and beneficial for the whole community, doubly and triply so
> > when we're talking about BC breaks. It shouldn't be just "whatever I
> > want, let me put it to a vote". RFCs are not a twitter poll where
> > anybody can vote on anything and anything goes. It should be used
> > responsibly, and if people don't understand this responsibility maybe
> > it's too early for them to propose any RFCs.
>
> Might I request that you please stick to discussing the actual topic of
> the RFC, rather than trying to shift the conversation towards who can
> and cannot propose RFCs :-)
>
> If you want to discuss changing the RFC mechanics and who is entitled to
> make them, please make your own RFC.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Mark Randall
>
> --
> PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
>
>