Re: RFC: Server-Side Request and Response Objects (v2)
| From: | Mike Schinkel | Date: | Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:42:26 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Server-Side Request and Response Objects (v2) | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-108708@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On Feb 20, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones@pmjones.io> wrote:
>
> One of the "open questions" on this RFC is: are the class names ServerRequest,
> ServerResponse, and ServerResponseSender "good enough" for our purposes, or are there
> names that are "better" in some qualitative way?
>
> Having said that, would something like, say, RequestContext and ResponseBuffer (with
> ResponseSender) be "better" somehow? Or perhaps some other names? Or are readers here
> satisfied that the existing names are sufficient?
I would pick the latter. They are — to me — more descriptive of actually what they are
accomplishing than the former.
-Mike