Re: RFC: Server-Side Request and Response Objects (v2)

> On Feb 20, 2020, at 18:42, Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net> wrote: > >> On Feb 20, 2020, at 10:26 AM, Paul M. Jones <pmjones@pmjones.io> wrote: >> >> One of the "open questions" on this RFC is: are the class names ServerRequest, >> ServerResponse, and ServerResponseSender "good enough" for our purposes, or are there >> names that are "better" in some qualitative way? >> >> Having said that, would something like, say, RequestContext and ResponseBuffer (with >> ResponseSender) be "better" somehow? Or perhaps some other names? Or are readers here >> satisfied that the existing names are sufficient? > > > I would pick the latter. They are — to me — more descriptive of actually what they are > accomplishing than the former. Thanks for that. As it hasn't seemed to pique anyone else's interest, maybe I will add this as a secondary vote, conditional on the primary one passing. -- Paul M. Jones pmjones@pmjones.io http://paul-m-jones.com Modernizing Legacy Applications in PHP https://leanpub.com/mlaphp Solving the N+1 Problem in PHP https://leanpub.com/sn1php