Re: [RFC] is_literal()

From: Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:50:44 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] is_literal()
References: 1  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to internals+get-109184@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Sat, Mar 21, 2020, at 2:13 PM, Craig Francis wrote: > Hi, > > I've written up my suggestion for a is_literal() function: > > https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal > > Any feedback would be appreciated. > > Craig While I appreciate the intent, without an untaint() or equivalent I fear its usefulness will be limited, or else it will get overused and thus cut off numerous entirely valid situations. Eg, there's plenty of very good reasons to put a template string into the database rather than a file literal. Or to build an SQL query dynamically in ways that an is_literal check would not allow, at least not without an absurdly complex query builder. Without a way to flag "yes, I know this was built dynamically but I've vetted it, it's OK" on a value, I fear such a check will either be unuseful or counter-productive. --Larry Garfield

« previous php.internals (#109184) next »