Re: [RFC] is_literal()
| From: | Ben Ramsey | Date: | Sat, 21 Mar 2020 20:06:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [RFC] is_literal() | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-109186@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> On Mar 21, 2020, at 14:13, Craig Francis <craig@craigfrancis.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've written up my suggestion for a is_literal() function:
>
> https://wiki.php.net/rfc/is_literal
>
> Any feedback would be appreciated.
>
> Craig
This seems very similar to the taint extension. How does it differ from ext-taint, and have you
considered working together with ext-taint?
https://www.php.net/manual/en/intro.taint.php
The name is_literal() is too ambiguous to me. As Dan suggested, the RFC should define what a literal
is.
Cheers,
Ben
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] Message signed with OpenPGP signature.asc