Re: Are PECL modules preferable?
| From: | Rowan Tommins | Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 2020 09:05:10 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Are PECL modules preferable? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-109224@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 00:23, Mike Schinkel <mike@newclarity.net> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 22, 2020, at 7:08 PM, Rowan Tommins <rowan.collins@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I glanced at a couple of the WordPress hosts you mentioned, and couldn't
> find a clear description of their PHP configurations, but I suspect it's
> similar - some "bundled" extensions won't be enabled (e.g. various database
> drivers), and some PECL extensions will be installed as standard (e.g.
> Redis).
>
> Here is what is on Pantheon for PHP 7.3.14:
>
> https://v73-php-info.pantheonsite.io/
>
Thanks. Without doing a thorough analysis, I can already confirm my
suspicions:
* The configure line includes '--without-gdbm' '--without-pspell'
'--disable-posix' '--disable-sysvmsg' '--disable-sysvshm'
'--disable-sysvsem'
* Installed extensions which are from PECL include apcu, mongodb, imagick,
newrelic, oauth, and redis
I don't want to imply that bundling has no value, but it's not a red line
preventing adoption.
Regards,
--
Rowan Tommins
[IMSoP]