RE: [PHP-DEV] Are PECL modules preferable?
| From: | Reinis Rozitis | Date: | Mon, 23 Mar 2020 18:22:07 +0000 |
| Subject: | RE: [PHP-DEV] Are PECL modules preferable? | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-109244@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mike Schinkel
>
> That is a utopian sentiment, but not valid in the corporate world that uses
> managed hosting because they are focused on operating their business and
> not on having to spend time, resources and management expertise in
> securing and running servers on the Internet.
Not sure if using "corporate world" in this argument is good either. "Corporate
world" typically doesn't want to change anything hence ~50% of the world still runs on
PHP5.
You will probably get more usage/adoption of the particular new feature in a php5/7 compatible php
pecl extension rather than waiting for a managed hosting to upgrade to PHP 8/NEXT (see something
like imagick, memcache or redis - not in a core at all, but probably rarely any host without those).
As for the "ensures many PHP developers will _never_ have access to them" - nowadays when
everything can run in containerized environments where you can setup/configure php in whatever
manner you like or the software needs, it usually isn't a problem anymore.
rr