Re: [VOTE] throw expression

Sorry Dan, at the time I sent this e-mail I wasn't aware you wouldn't receive it. After not hearing from you I assumed you were ok with my response. > The issue is that as your words are written, it is not possible for me > to understand exactly what you mean. To be fair, you omitted the next sentence which does answer your question, admittedly not as concretely as it should have: > IMO this is clear enough that a message for this edge case is not necessary. So to answer your question more directly, no error message was added. > The RFC as currently stands hasn't been updated since it was initially > put to discussion. Which means that anyone just reading the RFC won't > be aware of this issue that was brought up during the discussion. Again, to be fair, yours was literally the only criticism I received. And that example was taken from the RFC so it was already documented. Either way, I'm not opposed to a warning. What are the rules here, can I add this small change after voting has started? Regards, Ilija