Re: [RFC] Amendments to Attributes

On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 2:19 PM Benas IML <benas.molis.iml@gmail.com> wrote: > Agreed. > > I don't think we should pollute any other than the PHP\ > namespace. If > that RFC doesn't pass though, we should keep the Attribute > class in the > global namespace. > > Global namespace is already reserved for PHP and so, BC breaks aren't that > severe whereas Attributes\ namespace isn't reserved > therefore BC breaks > would be "unexpected". > > Best regards, > Benas Seliuginas > I mean, realistically speaking, BC breaks with Attributes\Attribute are a lot less likely than with just Attribute, regardless of what we reserve or don't. Some pragmatism, please. I don't particularly care what namespace the attribute classes are under, just that they should have a common namespace, because there's going to be many of them, presumably. If it was just a matter of the Attribute class, I'd definitely say this belongs in the global namespace, but that's not what we're dealing with at this point. Nikita