Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Remove inappropriate inheritance signature checks on private methods
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:07 AM Pedro Magalhães <mail@pmmaga.net> wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 3:46 PM Marco Pivetta <ocramius@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Considering that, as far as I know, only the constructor remains
>> "special".
>>
>
> Leaving the special case only for constructors instead of all magic
> methods sounds better to me. Right now, that sounds like a winning
> compromise for the RFC. It is still an exception to a rule, but one that
> can be better justified.
>
> Thanks,
> Pedro
>
I have updated both the implementation and the RFC to reflect this
exception for constructors. If no further discussion comes up, I'll open
the vote in a few days.
Regards,
Pedro
Thread (11 messages)