Re: [RFC] \PHP namespace usage heuristics

There are some problem by using double back slash for PHP namespace? Eg. Instead of \PHP\String be just \\String. Em ter, 7 de jul de 2020 19:04, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> escreveu: > On Tue, Jul 7, 2020, at 4:22 PM, Miguel Rosales wrote: > > Larry Garfield wrote on 07/07/2020 16:46: > > > This has reached the 2 week mark, but there's not been much > discussion. Anyone else want to weigh in? > > > > > > > I guess I'm missing something obvious here, but the RFC says: > > > > > 5. Component or sub-component namespaces MUST use CamelCase naming > > conventions. > > > > But then in the examples you've got e.g. \PHP\DOM\ or \PHP\SPL\... isn't > > that incorrect? > > > > And slightly related, is there any reason to use \PHP instead of \Php? > > > > Sorry if this has been discussed before, I haven't seen it. > > > > Cheers, > > Miguel > > Mm, mainly because I added the CamelCase clause late and didn't think > about abbreviations. Whether it should be PHP/XML/DOM or Php/Xml/Dom has > been an ongoing debate for at least since PHP 5.0. I have no preference > strong enough to die on that hill, though, so whatever voters are willing > to go for I'm good with. > > Anyone care enough to offer a bikeshed color? > > --Larry Garfield > > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: https://www.php.net/unsub.php > >