Re: [VOTE] Shorter Attribute Syntax Change

Hi, One question I'd like answered is that, like me, a few people have voted NO on the question to re-vote the syntax. If that is true, shouldn't their first primary choice be implied to be <<>> instead of anything else? I see 7 votes for no, but I'm the only one that still kept the first voting choice as <<>>. On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 9:40 AM Rowan Tommins <rowan.collins@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Aug 2020 at 14:08, Benjamin Eberlei <kontakt@beberlei.de> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 11:28 AM Peter Bowyer <phpmailinglists@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> I have voted no because I asked a question about the ending delimiter and > >> why () didn't count. Another person asked a similar question and neither > >> of > >> us got a reply. > >> > > > > () does not count as ending symbol, because it is not required, as such > > its not an ending symbol. > > > > > The question asked was that _if the parentheses were made mandatory_, would > this provide the same benefits ascribed to the other syntaxes? > > To avoid repeating myself, here are the previous posts where I elaborated > on this question: > > * https://externals.io/message/111312#111342 > * https://externals.io/message/111312#111354 > > > Regards, > -- > Rowan Tommins > [IMSoP] -- Guilherme Blanco SVP Technology at Statflo Inc. Mobile: +1 647 232 5599