Re: 回复: [PHP-DEV] [rfc:direct-executio n-opcode] Whether need __FILE__ the value of the file to rep lace the compiled opcode file path
| From: | Sara Golemon | Date: | Fri, 11 Dec 2020 14:52:30 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: 回复: [PHP-DEV] [rfc:direct-executio n-opcode] Whether need __FILE__ the value of the file to rep lace the compiled opcode file path | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.internals |
| Request: | Send a blank email to internals+get-112490@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 2:20 PM Morgan Breden <morganbreden@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm not 100% certain but I believe what chopins is proposing is the
> ability to require()/include() files generated by opcache, without
> including the .php file.
>
> The reference to __FILE__ is I believe a warning to using relative paths,
> since the compiled opcode file would be in a different location?
>
Yeah, I found their PR which made the intent a lot clearer. I would add
this to the already sizable list of reasons why that PR isn't a good idea.
-Sara